What, Me Worry?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1d5d/e1d5d80eac5736c81e3d86e2ac55df9360b32b9d" alt=""
"At first it looked like an outrageous crime harming innocent victims: a brave whistle-blower was smeared by a vicious White House politico who committed a felony by exposing the whistle-blower's wife as an undercover officer, endangering her and her contacts in the field."And now?
"For now, though, it looks as if this scandal is about a spy who was not endangered, a whistle-blower who did not blow the whistle and was not smeared, and a White House official who has not been fired for a felony that he did not commit. And so far the only victim is a reporter who did not write a story about it."He concludes: "What do you call a scandal that's not scandalous? Nadagate."
And I do believe, if you'd like to clear your palate, that you might wish to revisited Mark Steyn's column of almost exactly one year ago (July 18, 2004): "Here lies Joe Wilson."
Comments on "What, Me Worry?"