"The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing."

                --Archilochus

Glenn Reynolds:
"Heh."

Barack Obama:
"Impossible to transcend."

Albert A. Gore, Jr.:
"An incontinent brute."

Rev. Jeremiah Wright:
"God damn the Gentleman Farmer."

Friends of GF's Sons:
"Is that really your dad?"

Kickball Girl:
"Keeping 'em alive until 7:45."

Hired Hand:
"I think . . . we forgot the pheasant."




I'm an
Alcoholic Yeti
in the
TTLB Ecosystem



Thursday, January 12, 2006

Bad Money After Good

We see that the United States Mint has today introduced the new Jefferson nickel:
“This nickel features a forward-looking President Jefferson who recognized that the Louisiana Purchase and Lewis and Clark expedition would expand our horizons in numerous ways,” said United States Mint Acting Director David A. Lebryk. “This is a hopeful, positive image, emblematic of a bright future for our Nation.”
It is also unspeakably ugly.

Please don't mistake us. It is not nearly so hideous as the current dollar coin, the amazing and depressing "golden dollar," which includes a muddy portrait of Sacajawea.

There was a time, of course, when American coins were notable not only for their formidable heft, but for their considerable beauty and dignity.




Between 1878 and 1921, the United States minted the beautiful "Morgan" dollar, named after its designer (rather than, as is often thought, the banker). When a fellow flips one of these guys, he knows he's got cash. Each weighed nearly an ounce, and contained just a tad more than 3/4 ounce of silver, itself today worth about $6.70.


But there can be no dispute that one of the most beautiful coins ever minted, and certainly the most wonderful ever struck by the United States, was the Twenty Dollar Saint Gaudens "Double Eagle," minted between 1907 and 1933.

But, alas, those days appear to be over. Are there no artists who are up to the task? I think the reason is otherwise. To conceive and to strike an impressive coin requires a certain confidence, optimism, even triumphalist self-regard. Consider that our contemporary coins must be produced by the bureaucracy of the nanny state, while the more beautiful examples of the past come from the era that produced both Theodore Roosevelt and John D. Rockefeller.

It’s a thought.

Comments on "Bad Money After Good"

 

Blogger Muley said ... (12:59 PM) : 

GF, I agree with most of what you said. I love the Saint Gaudens coins, the Peace Dollar, and most of the old designs.

I guess I don't hate the new nickel like you do -- the old design to me was getting a bit stale, and though I wish they could have done something a bit more classic and dramatic, I don't mind the design they did pick.

By the way, in an article in my local paper about the new nickel, they said that they will be eliminating the current design on the $1 coin soon. They're apparently going to change the design every year like they're doing with the quarters. Each year, they will have $1 coins featuring four U.S. presidents. That should be neat, unless the renderings are goofy.

They also plan to redesign the penny in 2009 (Lincoln's 200th birthday), which might or might not be good. That obverse design is now 97 years old.

 

Blogger Gentleman Farmer said ... (8:54 PM) : 

The new nickel is by no means the worst coin struck by the United States. And I suppose I should have a soft spot for it: The portrait of Jefferson that is used is after a painting by my four-times great uncle, Rembrandt Peale.

 

Blogger Julie said ... (12:04 AM) : 

Rembrandt Peale?

Dang.

(Like the new look of the blog, by the way)

 

Blogger Hired Hand said ... (1:27 PM) : 

yeah, that artistic talent really made its way through the ranks, didn't it, pop? didn't know that about the new nickel, by the way - that's kind of a huge deal!

for what it's worth, the best thing we could do as far as redesigning the penny goes is eliminating it.

 

post a comment